Time between ST IV and V
#1
Posted 20 March 2012 - 08:47 PM
#2
Posted 20 March 2012 - 08:51 PM
“I'm not basically a happy person, but I have all kinds of joy.” Orson Welles


"When you are down and out something always turns up - and it is usually the noses of your friends."
Orson Welles
#3
Posted 24 March 2012 - 07:04 PM
Remember the stardate in IV is 8390 and the stardate in V is 8454.1. So, that should explain it right there as to how much of a gap it is between films. And of course we all know the date of VI 9521.6.
Edited by Ishimura, 26 March 2012 - 02:19 AM.

#4
Posted 24 July 2012 - 10:33 PM
--Captain Sisko
#5
Posted 28 February 2013 - 07:27 PM
#6
Posted 28 February 2013 - 09:38 PM
So, three weeks seems to be the answer.
As for ST:IV, Kirk said: " We are in the third month of our Vulcan exile."
Suggesting 3 months passed between ST:IV and ST:III.
There was also reference to the mutineers of the HMS Bounty "500 years ago" - the mutiny took place in 1789 putting ST:IV around 2289.
And Dr. Taylor said she had "300 years of catch-up learning to do", she is generally beleived to be from 1986, so this puts the bulk of the film around 2286.
There was a line spoken by President Jaresh-Inyo in Homefront (2372) that a state of emergency hadn't been declared on Earth in "a century". That would seem to refer to ST:IV, putting the date as early as 2272. - He was presumably exaggerating though because we know from Generations that Kirk had retired from Starfleet from at least 2282 to 2284. ST:II (and the subsequent films) would therefore have to be after 2284.



#7
Posted 28 February 2013 - 10:20 PM
Maltz, on 28 February 2013 - 07:27 PM, said:
I don't; the entire cast got considerably older (7 years!) between STII and V. Kirk's waistline expanded. Uhura went gray. And poor Scotty got a bit thick in the midsection as well... all in a year?? I don't think so. Not to mention the ship replaced its bridge module between IV and V. I assume that took a bit of time as well.
The Okuda Chronology works for me.
As they say in "A Piece of the Action"; "Don't make any cracks about the book!"
#8
Posted 01 March 2013 - 12:22 PM
P.S: Of course, if we were to take the first DC Comics series into account, then we might be able to stretch the time period further, as the comics posited additional adventures between II, III and IV (e.g. Kirk and co taking command of Excelsior for a while before having to abandon it and return to Vulcan in a captured Klingon BoP - again), but there's so much stuff in that series that contradicts later canon, I'm a bit reluctant to include it.
Edited by Maltz, 01 March 2013 - 12:26 PM.
#9
Posted 01 March 2013 - 01:07 PM
Maltz, on 01 March 2013 - 12:22 PM, said:
P.S: Of course, if we were to take the first DC Comics series into account, then we might be able to stretch the time period further, as the comics posited additional adventures between II, III and IV (e.g. Kirk and co taking command of Excelsior for a while before having to abandon it and return to Vulcan in a captured Klingon BoP - again), but there's so much stuff in that series that contradicts later canon, I'm a bit reluctant to include it.
Take Einstein's special relativity as they cruise at high impulse (sublight speeds) and it all works out...
Besides; I thought the comics aren't 'canon'? Another reason I always say canon is only as 'permanent' as the writers need it to be.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users












