Senior Member
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Maltz

  • Rank
    Constitution-Class Starship
  • Birthday 01/06/1985

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Marital Status
  • Favorite Trek Movie
    The Motion Picture
  • Favorite Trek Captain
    James T. Kirk
  • Favorite Trek Series
    The Original Series
  • Interests
    Reading, writing, watching DVDs, going to the movies, socialising

Recent Profile Visitors

3,190 profile views
  1. The Klingon Redesign?

    One problem with these new Klingons is that, if they all always look like that, you would never have gotten K'Ehyler or B'Elanna in the TNG era.
  2. "Redemption II" question

    It certainly looks that way on TV.
  3. Early in the episode "Redemption II", it's stated that the Klingon capital city is neutral territory in the civil war, and so the forces of Gowron and Duras may not fight one another there. Yet later on, when the Duras' forces have been bested, the Duras stronghold in the city is shown under heavy bombardment. How does this work??
  4. If characters from the version of history created after 2233 traveled back in time to a point before that (i.e. before the divergence), how would it effect things?
  5. Origin of the Terran Empire

    Yes, the foundation of the Empire is not the actual point of divergence; things were already different long before then. Heck, the Dark Passions books had it that it wasn't just restricted to human history; the Klingons revered Molor instead of Kahless.
  6. Origin of the Terran Empire

    I'm currently writing my own history of the MU, with the earliest differences on Earth being during Alexander the Great's sack of Thebes, where he does not spare the life of Timoclea after she kills the soldier who raped her, and in 476 AD, when Odoacer, having defeated Romulus Augustulus, kills the boy instead of sparing his life out of pity. Still unsure how the Terran Empire comes about though.
  7. Eugenics Wars and World War III

    Regarding the 30-35 million death toll mentioned in ENT from historical do we know those records are reliable? Dr Soong says at one point that very little is known for certain of the Eugenics Wars; some sources say different things. Perhaps later historians, biased against augments, exaggerated the extent of the carnage?
  8. Eugenics Wars and World War III

    Greg couldn't really have tied things in with events in the 2000s, as Khan and his brethren are defeated by 1996. How?
  9. Eugenics Wars and World War III

    I feel it's only fair to point out that, in Cox's novels, the Eugenics Wars aren't really "covert"; the people living under Khan's rule in India are aware of who he is; there are even public protests against him. And another augment addresses an assembly in the United Nations at one point. The general public in countries not directly affected by the wars simply weren't all that concerned about these people; they were just more warmongering nuts in a world already full of warmongering nuts. Really, the biggest discrepancy between the books and the TV shows is the huge death toll mentioned in ENT, significantly more than in the books (although there are a lot of casualties there).
  10. There's an episode of the Animated Series called "The Slaver Weapon", which states that about a billion years ago, the galaxy was ruled by something called the Slaver Empire until a massive war wiped out virtually all intelligent life for aeons. But then there's that TNG episode where they discover the first humanoids that existed billions of years ago and who seeded many worlds in the galaxy with their own DNA. If we discard the "one billion years ago" line in the TAS episode, is it plausible that the first humanoids and the Slavers were contemporaries, and possibly wiped one another out in the conflict? The hologram recording of the humanoid doesn't actually state that no other life apart from themselves existed in the galaxy in their time; just no life similar to themselves. And the TAS episode shows that the Slavers were distinctly non-humanoid.
  11. Spock's pon farrs

    Also, we know Tuvok went through several pon farrs before marrying his wife, so it would seem he was not bonded in his childhood. But they still don't have to marry whoever they mate with? Once they've mated, they have no further obligations? This would appear to be the case with Spock and Saavik, as after their encounter on the Genesis planet, they basically had no further contact.
  12. Spock's pon farrs

    He was betrothed, but his intended mate was in the Alpha Quadrant. Incidentally, what happens if a Vulcan's intended mate dies before the pon farr? Will the other Vulcan still experience it? If so, what happens?
  13. Spock's pon farrs

    The only characters we've seen exhibit pon farr were betrothed, so it appears that marriage is a requirement, but that appears to be separate from the act of pon farr. Spock wasn't married or betrothed to anyone when he underwent pon farr in ST III.
  14. Home is the Hunter

    Does anyone else really like this TOS novel? The framing story is set shortly after TMP, but involves Scotty, Chekov and Sulu being sent back in time to different periods in their respective country's histories; Scotty goes to Scotland in 1746, Chekov to WW2 Russia, and Sulu to early 17th century Japan. Meanwhile, in 2273, Kirk has to deal with Klingons and a powerful alien being.
  15. The Horta in the mirror universe

    Kirk would have killed the Horta for sure. As for the colony itself....the device the Horta stole was only a short distance away down the tunnel. Once they'd taken care of the Horta, Kirk and Spock could easily have gone down it and found the device and the nest. This would then confirm Spock's suspicions that the silicon spheres were Horta eggs, so it's likely Kirk would have ordered them all destroyed. I also wonder if Kirk would have had the colony supervisor executed for destroying the eggs in the first place and thereby endangering the colony, disrupting mining and causing unnecessary deaths. Thoughts?